The Tragedy of Y – Barnaby Ross (1932)

TheTragedyOfY2Ok Ellery Queen, you finally won me over.  I’ve been your critic up to now, but from this day forward, some part of me will always be your fan.  The Tragedy of Y did something for me that none of your books have ever accomplished – it kept me engaged from cover to cover.  More importantly, this is the one that’s sticking with me for a long time to come.

I recently abandoned my attempt to read Ellery Queen in order because it was just plain boring.  The four first period stories that I made it through were dry, overly long, and never really paid off in the end.  The same could be said for The Tragedy of X – my one encounter with Queen writers’ alter-ego Barnaby Ross.  Published in 1932 (the same year as The Greek Coffin Mystery and The Egyptian Cross Mystery), The Tragedy of X was a marathon of exhaustive police work and… weirdness.  You see, the amateur detective of the series, Drury Lane, is an odd character.  An actor residing in a storybook castle situated on the Hudson river, Lane exists somewhat outside of the realm of standard Golden Age reality.  His gnome-like servants, his positioning as a 60 year old adonis,… I really have no clue what the authors were going for.

In fact, The Tragedy of X might be classified as “awesomely bad”.  I despised it while I was trudging through it, but I look back on it through a strangely rose-tinted lens.  Not that I would ever want to read it again, but I would love nothing more than to share the war story over a few pints with some fellow bloggers.

I recently found myself on an in-and-out trip to New York and figured that if I had to suffer through a flight to La Guardia and the snarled traffic of The City, I might as well suffer through another Barnaby Ross book.  The Tragedy of Y was next in line.  Published the same year as The Tragedy of X (1932), I assumed that I could expect more of the same.  I walked in knowing that The Tragedy of Y was well regarded, showing up on several Best of Queen lists, but the same applied to The French Powder Mystery and The Greek Coffin Mystery, and neither of those did the trick for me.

The book wastes no time, with the sea-bloated corpse of York Hatter turning up in the opening pages.  The millionaire had been missing for several weeks and the papers were abuzz with rumors of what may have happened to him.  His oddball family is a tabloid fixture, with each member having their own peculiarities.  Indeed, this is one of those classic GAD families – the kind you find in books like Agatha Christie’s Crooked House or John Dickson Carr’s Poison in Jest: a cast of venomous characters.  Of course, that always makes for a fine set of suspects and an even finer killing field.

Although the circumstances surrounding York Hatter’s death are suspicious enough, it isn’t the focus of the book.  Rather, it is a series of crimes that follow that form the main backbone of the mystery.  It all starts with a young child being poisoned after sipping from a drink intended for another family member – Louisa Campion, a deaf, blind, mute.  Another murder attempt on Louisa follows, this one resulting in the death of the family matriarch and York’s widow, Emily Hatter.

It’s an interesting puzzle – why would someone be trying to kill a person who can’t hear, see, or speak?  The police are at a loss and consult Drury Lane since he proved successfully in The Tragedy of X.  Of course, this opens the door to weirdness.  As the police visit Lane’s castle on the Hudson, we learn that it is complete with a mock-village…that is actually inhabited by… I guess… people who have nothing better to do.  Similar to the first installment in the series, the authors use this as opportunity for… I’m not sure, but it’s unusual for the time…

“Mr Drury Lane was apprised of it by telephone.  He had been lying outstretched on the bare battlements of the castle, sunning his nude body, when old Quacey stumbled up the curved turret stairs, his gnome’s face purple with exertion…  Lane wriggled his brown body forward and squatted on his lean haunches.”

My trip to New York was a fortunate coincidence for this read – I was situated about 30 miles north of NYC on the Hudson, which seems to be roughly where Drury Lane’s fairy tale estate was.  I’m always jealous when visiting England, but I’ll say that Westchester County, NY is absolutely gorgeous verdant lusciousness.

Most of the story takes place in Manhattan though, and it is absolutely riveting.  It’s strange for me to be saying this about an early-30’s Queen novel, but at several points my eyes were nailed to the page.  One particularly memorable passage involves Louisa Campion being interviewed about what she “witnessed” during a murder, with the interview taking place via a combination of braille and sign language.  The atmosphere was so dense that my skin crawled as Louisa mimed out what she had experienced during the crime via the sensations of touch and smell.

This isn’t the only scene that sticks with me, but they’re best to experience for yourself.  There’s a thrilling bit involving a manuscript – I’m a sucker for any “story within a story” – see The Red Widow Murders or The Plague Court Murders.  Another section that had me on the edge of my seat involved the reader witnessing the killer at work, yet without the identity being revealed.

I have to say, I even walked into this one with it kind of spoiled for me.  This is one of those books where people just can’t help but make an analogy to another famous title.  And, of course, it’s the type of analogy where you’re like “oh, I think I know what that translates to…”.  Kind of like if I said “Book X reminds me of Death on the Nile”, you’d be like “well, damn man, thanks for ruining that for me.”

It wasn’t ruined though – not completely.  While I wasn’t privy to the enjoyment of an aspect of the reveal, I was able to watch it unfold.  Parts of that were fun – similar to me watching Agatha Christie spin her craft after figuring out the solution to A Murder is Announced (although the Queen cousins are nowhere near as deft of artists as Christie – not by a mile).  In other aspects, I misinterpreted what I was reading in a sense – in particular thinking that an earlier crime had a slightly different motive.  In the end, I can’t really guess how much of the experience was spoiled for me, but I can say that I’ll look back on this one fondly.

This is one of those rare titles that just grabbed a piece of me and held on to it.  Murder in Retrospect, Green for Danger, Fog of Doubt, She Died a Lady, Death Comes as the End, maybe even The Hollow – these are books that stick in your mind, and The Tragedy of Y goes down as one of those.  The cover of my 1945 Pocket Edition (pictured at the top) morphed from purely being a cool piece of vintage art to the type of thing you get tattooed to your arm and when asked about reply “nah, it’s too personal to talk about”.  Oh, and the title of the book?  Pure beauty.

TheTragedyOfYIt’s not perfect though.  The denouement has some dry parts, verging on academic  – an angle that felt hardly necessary having anticipated aspects of the solution.  Several pages are devoted to arithmetic that could have been summed up in a single sentence by hands such as Carr, Christie, or Brand.  There are some gorgeous touches though, with the motivation behind several clues (a murder weapon in particular) being a touch above the norm.

What will stick with me the most though is a haunting ending.  A question is posed, and, to me at least (embarrassingly?), feels unanswered.  It’s one of those things where you’re like “I think I get what is being implied”, but I just wasn’t positive.  I’ll take it that way.


A fun aside – it’s no bit of trivia to point out that Drury Lane is deaf – the authors remind you of the fact that he relies on lip reading constantly.  However, on page 145 of my Pocket edition, they slip up: “Lane heard his heavy breathing, the sounds of a scraping hand, and then a muffled exclamation.”  I’ve avoided including some extra context with this quote, but I can assure you that given the circumstances, it is impossible that Lane was reading lips.  Anyway, that’s my GAD nerd moment for the day.


As a request, if you choose to comment below, please avoid drawing a parallel between The Tragedy of Y and any other books that hint towards the solution.  I still enjoyed this one with it partially spoiled, but let’s give others a fighting chance.

22 thoughts on “The Tragedy of Y – Barnaby Ross (1932)”

  1. I’m very fond of this one for a number of reasons — partly because, as you note, it’s a very well-handled instance of the “poisoned family” motif. EQ goes back to this in There Was An Old Woman but with different effect. It must have been interesting to live in a time when syphilis was an incurable disease …
    And I share your pleasure in “the motivation behind … the murder weapon”.

    Like

  2. Well, huzzah and hooray! At last you’ve entered the fold! Y is definitely an improvement over X. I think Noah would agree that it’s possibly the most Van Dine-ian novel the Queens wrote. Let me know when you’re ready to read The Tragedy of Z: it, and Drury Lane’s Last Case, are the only Queen’s I’ve never read. We can do it together!

    Aidan, I think nudism was a fad in the 1930’s, but that’s not what’s happening here. The authors are going gangbusters to create an eccentric detective. Honestly, it’s way over the top in X and Y, and it doesn’t do much for me.

    And Ben, you are in for a treat with There Was an Old Woman, which I like lots more than this one. If Y is their Van Dine novel, then TWaOW is their screwball comedy of a novel. Although, given how much you like Carr’s Grand Guignol stuff, you might be bored with TWaOW. Honestly, I can no longer predict how you will react to Queen’s work at all. I’m crossing my fingers on the Wrightsville novels (which you HAVE to read in order, man! Otherwise, you get into spoiler country!)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I promise I’ll read the Wrightsville novels in order. I’ve been looking forward to them since the beginning.

      As for finally loving a Queen novel – I expected it the whole time and I’m thankful it finally happened. It seemed incomprehensible that such a well regarded author could be so plain. I’ll let you know when I’m ready for the next Drury Lane.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Glad to see you’ve finally found a Queen novel you can wholeheartedly recommend.

    I’ll be waiting over here to see what Nick Fuller thinks of your assessment of that murder weapon dénouement. I still remember his rants over this subject on the GA mailling list. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Could I say that I sympathise with you having read this novel partially spoilt… For that was my experience, having read a review that was meant to be spoiler-free. If I recall correctly, the reviewer mentioned another author, whom I’d read – and that was sufficiently heavy a hint. 😞

    Like

  5. What? You found an EQ you actually like! Carr or Christie are usually the ones who spring a surprise of this magnitude on me, but glad you liked it. I read this one all all the way back in the mid-2000s, but still remember the atmospheric scene you mentioned with Louisa and the fantastic clue of the blunt instrument.

    You liking this one probably means you’ll prefer the darker, weirder titles over the international series. So you’ll probably be able to appreciate There Were Was An Old Woman and the other Ellery in Wonderland titles.

    Like

  6. It’s always a delicate balancing act when you mention similarities between one work and another! In writing posts on my blog, I’ve decided just to forego any such references, even vague ones to “a certain well-known book published a few years later”. No point in showing how well-read I am in the mystery field if I’m spoiling the fun for others! (And I also keep my fingers crossed that… to use fictitious names here… if someone leaves a comment on my review of A LITTLE MATTER OF MURDER by Cecily Grimthorpe, they don’t say “the ending was just like WHO DRILLED THAT DAME by Spike Steel” when I haven’t read Mr. Steel’s book yet.)

    I loved the “motivation behind… the murder weapon,” as you describe it.

    Very nice catch of the authors referring to Lane being able to hear something when that wasn’t actually possible.

    And I look forward to your thoughts on There Was an Old Woman! As well as having an ingenious chain of reasoning leading to the solution, it’s one of the most enjoyable Queens ever on the plain old “good read” level.

    Like

  7. Huh. Well, who knew? Okay, everyone knew, since this is widely regarded as an excellent book, but it’s nice to have that borne out by experience.

    Out of interest — asking for a friend, as they say, since I’m committed to my modulus in-order reading approach (for the time being) — would it be necessary to read X before this one?

    Like

  8. I have the same edition as you, and have fought my way to page 61 and must now admit defeat in caring about any of this and, by extension, Queen in general. I think it’s time I finally give up on these guys, because I just do not see whatever it is that is meritorious to others in their writing.

    Hopefully we’ll meet face to face one day and you can fill me in on the delights of this, but for now…no more, I’m finished with EQ for good. I shall leave them to those who enjoy them, and happily.

    Like

    1. I admit I’m a bit surprised by this, as I remembered The Tragedy of Y as being more readable than the rest of the Queen stuff. And yet this was written in 1932, while Queen where at the heights of writing boredom inducing novels, so I’m actually second guessing my own recollection of the readability. And yet you know I’m the first (or second) in line when there’s an opportunity to rip on Queen. Plus, reading back through my review confirms that I did indeed love this one and stirs a bit of the memory, and I’m half tempted to suggest you finish it.

      Anyway, yeah, I won’t argue with your choice to abandon Queen for good. I’ve had plenty of struggles myself, and yet I trudge on with this morbid determination. Probably because I bought like 30 books in bulk five years ago and most have really nice covers.

      Like

      1. Don’t doubt your memory, it’s absolutely me who is at fault here. I mean, I didn’t even enjoy The Siamese Twin Mystery, and absolutely everyone holds that in the highest possible regard where GAD is concerned.

        I’ll keep this one on my shelf in case the urge takes me 20 years from now, but for the time being I’m off to spend time with writers I enjoy. And maybe some Brian Flynn 😆

        Liked by 1 person

  9. I really loved The Tragedy of Y. Mine is the IPL version with ”A Golden Age Masterpiece” preceding the title. And having read it I can say that isn’t merely puff; the subtitle is fully merited. I was enjoying their international themed work previous to this anyway, but this was.. unexpectedly sublime, potentially the new high water mark of my GAD reading thus far and probably the game changer that leads to me reading EQ exclusively through the summer.

    Like

    1. Not only is the subtitle fully merited, but the book title is merited as well. Definitely an ending that sticks with you.

      Good luck on your summer of Queen reading. So far the books that I’ve enjoyed most are Calamity Town and The Four of Hearts.

      Like

      1. Indelible ending. Fairly certain your surmise is what the reader is supposed to infer and I feel the beautifully understated handling of the matter – with the one detective who realises the truth leading away his head-scratching partner, for whom the penny has yet to drop, in a “…lets leave it at that” manner – made it all the more impactful.

        Thanks, I haven’t been this excited about gorging on an author’s work since Halter in ’21. I intended to tackle them chronologically but within seconds of finishing this I was compelled to buy Tragedy of X and Drury Lane’s Last Case (not Tragedy of Z though since annoyingly I couldn’t find a matching IPL copy). But scrolling through the comments I saw an analogy made between ToY and TWaOW so of course I had to snap that one up, too.

        Like

        1. I found The Tragedy of X to be hard to choke down. It’s a marathon of combing over every last detail of various crime scenes, although there are some wonderfully bizarre nuggets in that book.

          Like

Leave a comment

Playing Detective

Thoughts on mystery fiction and games

Golden Age of Detective Fiction

Detective Fiction of the 1920's & 1930's

Solving the Mystery of Murder

Investigating CLASSIC MYSTERIES

A Crime is Afoot

A Random Walk Through Classic Crime Fiction

Long Live The Queens!

About Ellery Queen and other GAD authors

James Scott Byrnside

Author of impossible-crime murder mysteries

Countdown John's Christie Journal

A review of Agatha Christie's crime novels and short stories from beginning to end

Dead Yesterday

Classic Mysteries and Domestic Suspense

Noirish

The annex to John Grant's *A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Film Noir*

Justice for the Corpse

Reviews of classic fair-play mystery fiction - spoiler-free unless otherwise noted

Composed Almost Entirely of Books

Books read, books written, books I just spotted and covet like an ox

Mysteries Ahoy!

Detecting Great Crime Fiction