I must be a bit of an idiot. How else could I explain walking into Heads You Lose thinking “this might be ok”? I mean, come on – I’ve absolutely loved Christianna Brand’s mysteries up to now. The set ups are great, yep. The solutions are a seemingly contradictory blend of earth shattering and simply obvious. And man, her writing… If there’s another author with this sense of wit and the ability to craft a cast of characters, let me know.
I’ve read most of Brand’s nine mainstream mysteries (she published a handful more that for some reason fly under the radar), and aside from the elusive and enamored The Death of Jezebel, I’ve only had Heads You Lose and Death in High Heels left to go. And so I’ve saved them; on one hand so I had some of Brand at her best left (which is somewhat of an errant thought – her lesser known books have been excellent), but also because I had the impression that some reviewers had lesser impressions of these early books. Yeah, I realize there’s a bit of a contradiction there.
I guess I’ll forever harbor this assumption that the first few books from an author aren’t going to be that good, when really you can imagine that it’s the first few books that actually established them in the first place. The examples I can provide that will resonate the widest are Agatha Christe’s The Mysterious Affair at Styles and John Dickson Carr’s It Walks By Night. In both cases, I figured “this won’t be that good”, and was subsequently blown away.
I’ve been on a binge of good reads lately and figured that I’d reach into my Brand trove. I had the sense that I was going to enjoy Heads You Lose, but there was still that trepidation. Then I opened the book and flipped through the initial pages. There it was – a list of characters and that trademark gauntlet thrown down: “Among these ten very ordinary people were found two victims and a murderer.”
If you haven’t read Brand before, it’s a key feature of her novels: a list of dramatis personae and that telltale phrase. Granted, any list of characters at the front of a mystery novel (which was a popular feature in Avon, Pocket Books, and Dell editions during the 40s) implies at least one victim and a murderer. With Brand, it’s a bit different though. It isn’t merely a decision on the part of a particular publisher for a particular edition; it’s part of the novel proper. And there’s a sense of claustrophobia in the way Brand does it – a mere 10 names in the case of Heads You Lose, nearly a third of which will either kill or die.
Most any review of the book that you read will focus on the aspect of the plot that intersects with book’s title: a woman declaring she wouldn’t be caught dead in a ditch wearing a particular hat, and then being found later exactly so. It’s a worthy headline for sure, but it’s more what Brand does with that premise that makes this story shine. Which characters knew that the comment about the hat had been made? Who had access to the thoroughly locked house in which the hat was kept at the time of the murder? Therein lies our closed circle of suspects.
To focus on that first murder though does Heads You Lose a disservice. In my mind, the true star is the second murder, with a decapitated corpse discovered in a pavilion surrounded by untouched snow. The closed circle of suspects is confirmed once more, with only a select group of individuals having access to a key piece of evidence found with the body. And really, that’s the main game Brand plays with the book. Through the two crimes, she establishes that one of our cast of suspects must have committed the crime, and yet that’s contradicted by the circumstances and alibis. She has a great deal of fun with that, and the number of theories and false solutions provided rivals any… well, Christianna Brand novel.
In a sense, Heads You Lose is the prototype for a later Brand novel (and one of her triumphs), Suddenly at His Residence. It’s startling similar, in particular with the fervent rush towards the end through a spiral of solutions. Suddenly at His Residence excels in that the solutions to its two crimes are outstanding, and that’s unfortunately the relative point of weakness to Heads You Lose. Don’t get me wrong, Heads You Lose packs a wallop, in particular with a startling overturning of an assumption most every reader will have made. Yet the ending lacks that sucker punch that you come to expect from Brand’s work, even though it has all the potential to. Brand threw solution after solution at me, and in that final chapter, I found myself wanting one more.
Still, it’s as good of an ending as you get from 95% of mysteries. As complex of a puzzle that Brand presents to you, it’s all amazingly simple in hindsight. Everything really hinges on Brand’s key talent – allowing the reader (and characters) to make innate assumptions without realizing they’re doing so. Once the assumptions are dissolved, the revelations manifest on their own without Brand having to take you by the hand and explain it all.
The whole thing was an amazing read, my favorite scene being one where the suspects try to recreate the impossible crime of no footprints in the snow (besting a similar scene in The Problem of the Wire Cage). A week has gone by and I still have Heads You Lose stuck in my head – and that’s typical of Brand. So, I was delightfully wrong about this one. Hopefully I’ll be just as wrong about Death in High Heels.
I snatched up my 1988 Bantam Books edition because it was cheap, not because of the cover. And yet, having read this and looked through the other covers online, I actually think this might be the best one. In particular, I like the depiction of the feather and flower hat that leads to all the trouble – a detail not properly captured on other covers.
Interestingly, the inner cover of my edition promises that “coming soon” are Bantam editions of The Rose in Darkness, A Ring of Roses, and The Death of Jezebel. I’m nearly positive these never came to be, which is unfortunate because all three books are very difficult to find, and I imagine that wouldn’t be the case if they had been back in print during the late 80s.
22 thoughts on “Heads You Lose – Christianna Brand (1941)”
This is my least favorite Brand; the ending was so frightfully disappointing. Your review, however, has made me think twice. In a couple months, I’ll be posting Brand reread reviews. Hopefully, I have a better time with it.
The ending is disappointing. Or, to put it a bit differently – the final few chapters of the book are excellent, but the solution disappoints (despite over turning that assumption I mentioned). I’ll switch to ROT-13 to discuss specifics.
Gur fbyhgvba gb gur vzcbffvoyr pevzr nofbyhgryl qvfnccbvagf. Oenaq tbg gur perngvir whvprf sybjvat jura gur punenpgref gel gb erperngr gur pevzr, naq gura vg gheaf bhg gb or fbzrguvat fb onfvp.
Gur vqragvgl bs gur xvyyre qvfnccbvagrq, va cnegvphyne gurve “pbaqvgvba”. V fb qrfcrengryl jnagrq vg gb ghea bhg gung Sena jnf gur xvyyre, jvgu gur fhvpvqr bs gur erny xvyyre gheavat bhg gb or n qrfcrengr npg gb fnir ure. Gung jbhyq unir cebivqrq Oenaq’f glcvpny thg chapu raqvat.
Ohg fgvyy, gur encvq sver snyfr fbyhgvbaf cebivqrf n guevyyvat raq, naq V ybir ubj gur gehr fbyhgvba ohvyqf bss bs rnpu snyfr fbyhgvba va cvrprf. Engure guna Oenaq ynlvat vg nyy bhg ba gur gnoyr, lbh fvzcyl trg punenpgref fnlvat “bu, gung cneg jnf pbeerpg”, juvpu srryf yvxr gur nhgube vf yrggvat lbh cvrpr ovgf gbtrgure ba lbhe bja. Naq gur gehgu nobhg jub cynprq gur pnyy sebz vafvqr gur ubhfr – oevyyvnag.
Gur pnyy sebz gur ubhfr jnf qryvpvbhf. Sbe fbzr ernfba, vg fgevxrf zr nf bar bs gur zbfg Puevfgvrfu guvatf Oenaq rire jebgr.
I love Death In High Heels. It’s got some really funny savagery to it.
I’ve had this novel on my Kindle since nearly the day I bought it (the Kindle) and I’ve yet to read it. I believe I’ll have to remedy that this summer thanks to this review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think this was sitting on a shelf for two years for me. Hopefully I have more like it tucked away.
I’m in the same position as you! I loved ‘Tour’, ‘Jezebel’, ‘Green’ and ‘Residence’ (not in this precise order) – and then I realised I left her ostensibly weaker, possibly weakest’, 2 novels for last: ‘High Heels’ and ‘Heads’. Which made me go 😨 -> 😰 -> 😱
So I’m glad to hear ‘Heads’ is a good read! I recently picked up ‘High Heels’ with some trepidation, and thought it was better than I anticipated, given the reviews I had read. Yeah, some parts of the story didn’t make full sense and in general the story went on for too long. But some nifty tricks were involved which made me a happy reader. 🤓✨
I have ‘Rose of Darkness’ somewhere on my shelf – which I purchased because of a blogger’s recommendation. Was it you…?
Yes, I’m the one who recommended The Rose in Darkness. Not everyone agrees though – both JJ
and James Scott Burnsidethought it was a bit of rubbish, if I recall correctly. Still, I love it. Every six months or so I have to pick it back up just to read the final two pages.
I’m glad to hear that Death in High Heels has some nifty tricks. I’m looking forward to it.
I thought it was fantastic –https://jamesscottbyrnside.com/2019/08/05/the-rose-in-darkness/
Oops, I stand corrected. Another opportunity to read your review though!
Ooh, I love finding myself in the middle of a Brand lovefest!
The saddest thing for me is that she wasn’t as prolific as Christie and Carr. That would have made this a more perfect world!! 🙂 I really need to re-read all of these because I’ve really only read them all once – and that was a long time ago. What’s killing me is that I’ve never read – and cannot find – A Ring of Roses!! 😦
And John – The Rose in Darkness may not be her best, but it’s heartbreaking and well worth searching out!
A Ring of Roses is excellent, although it would probably get ranked towards the tail end of Brand’s books just because the rest are so good. It’s somewhat reminiscent of Cat and Mouse. As to finding it – I thought there was an eBook version of it, if you do those.
This is also my least favorite Brand, but your review makes me think the Dutch translation might have been the problem. I don’t remember any false solutions and thought at the time the story was on the short side. So a reread in English is probably in order.
A more prolific Brand would have never eclipsed Christie, but she would have certainly snatched the crown from either Sayers, Marsh or Allingham. And deservedly so!
A more prolific Brand would have deserved a seat at the table alongside Carr and Christie.
This is one I’m still yet to track down, and as such I’d largely avoided any opinions about it. While I’m not a fan of everything Brand wrote — yes, the ending of Rose in Darkness is devastating, but the preceding 280 pages of Smug Young Things still vex me — I find her a fascinating prospect where the mystery story is concerned. And it’s nice to have something left to chase, though it’d be great if someone reprinting GAD could get round to her.
Heads You Lose is 100% mystery, very much in the vein of Suddenly At His Residence. And yeah, how about reprinting Brand? The fact that I can’t get a physical copy of Death of Jezebel is criminal.
I know, right? The fact that you can’t find one is most suspicious. Something really should be done about her unavailability…
“Something really should be done about her unavailability…”
I suggest a Locked Room International omnibus edition, like The Derek Smith Omnibus, containing Death of Jezebel with her unpublished Cockrill novel (The Chinese Puzzle) and Charlesworth novella (“The Dead Hold Fast”).
LikeLiked by 2 people